by John Farrell.
Concentrating solar has promised big additions to
renewable energy production with the additional benefit of energy
storage—saving sun power for nighttime—but there’s a catch. Most of the new power plants are big water users despite being planned for desert locations.
With solar photovoltaic (PV) prices dropping so rapidly, does concentrating solar still make sense?
Concentrating solar thermal power uses big mirrors to focus sunlight
and make electricity. Think kids with magnifying glasses, but making
power instead of frying ants. The focused sunlight makes heat, the heat makes steam, and the steam powers a turbine to make electricity. In “wet-cooled” concentrating solar power plants, more water is used to make power than in any other kind of power plant. The following chart illustrates the
amount of water used to produce power from various technologies:
Water consumption can be cut dramatically
by using “dry-cooling,” but this change increases the cost per
kilowatt-hour (kWh) of power generated from concentrating solar power
(CSP). In the 2009 report “Juice from Concentrate,”
the World Resources Institute reports that the reduction in water
consumption adds 2-10 percent to levelized costs and reduces the power
plant’s efficiency by up to 5 percent.
Let’s see how that changes Institute for Local Self-Reliance’s original
levelized cost comparison between CSP and solar PV. Here’s the
original chart comparing PV projects to CSP projects, with no discussion
of water use or energy storage:
To make the comparison tighter, we’ll
hypothetically transform the CSP plants from wet-cooled to dry-cooled,
adjusting the levelized cost of power.
Using the midpoint of each estimate from “Juice from Concentrate” (6 percent increase to levelized costs and 2.5 percent efficiency
reduction), the change in the cost per kWh for dry-cooling instead of
wet-cooling is small but significant. For example, all three
concentrating solar power projects listed in the chart are wet-cooled
power plants. With a 6 percent increase in costs from dry-cooling and a 2.5 percent
reduction in efficiency, the delivered cost of electricity would rise by
approximately 1.7 cents per kWh.
The following chart, modified from an earlier post, illustrates the comparison:
With the increased costs to reduce water
consumption, CSP’s price is much less competitive with PV. A distributed solar PV program by Southern
California Edison has projected levelized costs of 17 cents per kWh for
1-2 megawatt solar arrays, and a group purchase program for residential solar in Los Angeles has a levelized cost of just 20 cents per kWh.
In other words, while wet-cooled CSP
already struggles to compete with low-cost, distributed PV, using dry-
cooling technology makes residential-scale PV competitive with CSP.
But there’s one more piece: storage.
Storage
While Nevada Solar One was built without
storage, the PS10 and PS20 solar towers were built with one hour of
thermal energy storage. Let’s see how that changes the economics.
To make the comparison comparable, we’ll
add the cost of one hour of storage to our two PV projects, a cost of
approximately $0.50 per Watt, or 2.4 cents per kWh. The following chart
illustrates a comparison of PV to CSP, with all projects having one hour
of storage (Nevada Solar One has been removed as it does not have
storage):
When comparing CSP with storage (and lower
water use) to PV with battery storage, we have a comparison that is
remarkably similar to our first chart. Distributed PV at a commercial
scale (1-2 megawatts) is still cheaper than CSP, but residential PV is more
expensive.
Even though dry-cooled CSP competes favorably on price, it still uses much more water than PV. That issue is probably why many solar project developers are switching from CSP to PV technology for their large-scale desert projects.
Concentrating solar thermal power had its moment of cost advantage a few years ago, but the rapid pace (and zero water use) of solar PV installations has quickly eroded even the energy storage advantage of CSP.
Related Links:
Solar-powered oil field runs on sunshine, irony
Want to save energy? Stop wasting water
No comments:
Post a Comment